Christophe Koudella
2009-10-05 15:43:49 UTC
Hi,
I am constrained to work with boost 1.34.1 and gcc for some time to come
by
my firm.
I am quite interested in setting up pyublas in this setting. Given that it
is recommended
that boost 1.35 or higher and gcc 4.x be used, I wonder if anybody knows if
these are
serious limitations?
Presumably having an earlier version of gcc is not too limiting, but what
about boost
1.34.1? That serious? The pyublas package being small, I would be happy to
dig into
the internals in order to figure out the compilation, but I would appreciate
knowing if
there is a fundamental limitation in using boost 1.34.1.
Many thanks for any input,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tiker.net/pipermail/pyublas/attachments/20091005/bf386d17/attachment.htm>
I am constrained to work with boost 1.34.1 and gcc for some time to come
by
my firm.
I am quite interested in setting up pyublas in this setting. Given that it
is recommended
that boost 1.35 or higher and gcc 4.x be used, I wonder if anybody knows if
these are
serious limitations?
Presumably having an earlier version of gcc is not too limiting, but what
about boost
1.34.1? That serious? The pyublas package being small, I would be happy to
dig into
the internals in order to figure out the compilation, but I would appreciate
knowing if
there is a fundamental limitation in using boost 1.34.1.
Many thanks for any input,
Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.tiker.net/pipermail/pyublas/attachments/20091005/bf386d17/attachment.htm>